Torah Vs Christianity

Comparing the differences

With a humble heart, I endeavor to elucidate the distinctions between modern Christianity and the Torah. My aim is to weave in numerous lessons, explore the biblical meanings of key terms, and provide resources to equip as many individuals as possible with a scriptural education rooted solely in the Bible. My intent is not to offend, but to gently guide others toward the true Messiah as revealed in Scripture.
 
By Yah’s grace I have been trained through the scriptures to engage in biblical dialogue—a practice some in Christianity might label as arguing, though I remain uncertain why. Yet, I hold fast to hope, whether we term it dialogue, debate, or even argument, such fellowship aligns with the biblical principle of “iron sharpening iron,” provided our focus remains on scriptural fidelity rather than human traditions. Please feel free to explore my work or reach out via email—I am always available to assist.
 
Shalom!

Torah Disciples Vs Christians
Was Yeshua a Christian?

Biblically speaking, the answer is no. The Messiah was a believer, and nowhere in the Scriptures does Yeshua refer to Himself as a Christian. Such designations are rooted in tradition rather than biblical text. Moreover, He never called His followers in the newer scriptural text “Christians” but instead identified them as Disciples, Friends, Servants, and even Little Flock, but never Christians.

So, where did the title “Christian” originate?
The Book of Acts provides some insight. It records that in Antioch, “unbelievers” referred to Paul and Barnabas using a specific term. However, this terminology varies across translations. For instance, in the King James Version (KJV), New Living Translation (NLT), and several other Western versions, the text states that the people of Antioch called them “Christians.” Yet, in the Jewish Bible and certain translations like The Scriptures, the apostles are described as “Messianic.” This discrepancy reveals an ambiguity—not only is it unclear which term the unbelievers actually used, but the precise label is ultimately secondary. 
 
What matters is that neither “Christian” nor “Messianic” as a title originated from Yah or Yeshua. Since it did not proceed from the mouth of Yah, its human origin diminishes its significance in the context of biblical truth. The only thing these man-made titles concerning denomination could help identify from afar is the accuracy of one’s doctrine.
 
That’s why when people ask me if I’m a Christian, I say no. For I don’t see myself as a Christian, but rather as a believer in Yeshua Messiah because he’s the one that I’m following, not the unbelievers at Antioch. Our focus must remain on scriptural accuracy, not on traditional doctrine, which lacks the power to redeem.
 
Certain Torah teachers and leaders may overlook the term “Christian” not out of negligence, but because they prioritize addressing more pressing subjects or correcting matters of greater significance. The word “Christian” does not pertain to salvation; rather, it serves primarily as a marker of identification. Consequently, some Torah converts might continue to employ the term “Christian” when engaging in debates on other topics, either due to its secondary importance or because they have not yet arrived at a deeper understanding of its implications.
Are youth pastors biblical?

The answer is no. Youth pastors are not biblical; there is not a single mention of a “youth pastor” within the entirety of the 66 books of Scripture. This role is an invention of modern religious traditions, rooted in human folly rather than divine ordinance. Such practices have diluted the potency of Yah’s word and undermined the fulfillment of its promises wherever they are implemented. They burden new converts with unnecessary obstacles, robbing them of deeper spiritual understanding. This represents a misguided effort by confused, unenlightened, and unqualified leaders to refine a church order that Elohim has already perfected and which His Messiah has clearly taught.

Torah leaders and teachers do not engage in such folly. They faithfully adhere to the precise instructions set forth in the biblical text.

Church Nursery

Church nurseries lack any biblical foundation. Not a single instance exists in Scripture where a congregation entrusted their children to others within the same assembly for supervision during a sermon. This presents a profound dilemma. Consider the absurdity: assigning a servant, perhaps childless, with no motherly instinct or training, to oversee the offspring of those who have children so she can attend the service in the same congregation while the other stays behind. Such a practice defies reason.

This tradition has engendered numerous complications within contemporary Christianity, leading to a troubling reliance on secular courts to adjudicate disputes—a clear violation of biblical principles. The Apostle Paul explicitly cautioned in 1 Corinthians chapter 6 against this very conduct in his admonitions to the church.

Rather than adhering to scriptural guidance, many congregations compound their error by installing cameras in nursery rooms and requiring background checks for caregivers, as though spiritual discernment were insufficient.

Yet the root problem lies precisely in their lack of discernment. Were it present, they would heed the biblical mandate allowing mothers to remain with their children during worship. Scripture further instructs that should a woman have questions, she may seek clarification from her husband at home as instructed in 1 Corinthians 14:35, for women are also called to maintain silence during church gatherings. But how many do?

It is not inherently sinful to adopt alternative measures, provided they do not contravene scriptural principles.

Consider this example:

Should a child begin to cry, the mother may retreat with the child to a designated area or step outside, yet still partake in the preaching.

In our present era, devising solutions that align with Yah’s divine order requires minimal effort. A husband, relative, or friend within the congregation could simply initiate a phone call to the mother, placing the device nearby, enabling her to listen to the sermon through her cell phone while tending to her child.

This approach remains viable whether she is at the church parking lot in her cart, at home or anywhere else in the world. Addressing certain challenges within the modern church demands little ingenuity; the pertinent question, however, is whether the church will heed such wisdom.

However, addapting burdensome tradition as a form of religious service has precipitated grave consequences, leading many to misrepresent and malign the name of Yeshua and the integrity of His teachings.

Altar Calling

The practice of altar calls lacks biblical grounding, and though it is not inherently sinful, it imposes an undue burden on individuals.

Consider this example:

A person seeking to attend a service, repent, and deepen their faith—yet possessing little biblical knowledge—might erroneously conclude that repentance requires participation in this ceremonial ritual known as an “altar call.”

They may perceive that without enduring what could feel, in the moment, like public embarrassment, salvation remains unattainable. For those who are inherently private or shy, the prospect of such exposure may deter them from responding to the invitation, fearing ridicule or gossip. I, too, once counted myself among them.

In my experience with these so-called altar calls, I seldom, if ever, heard a preacher clarify that repentance can occur privately at home through earnest prayer and a genuine plea for God’s forgiveness—a practice, notably, that aligns with scriptural teaching.

Whether this omission stems from a desire to enlist new congregants into service within their churches or from sheer ignorance remains unclear. Yet, as I mature, I increasingly observe a troubling prevalence of uninformed leaders. This phenomenon erects a formidable obstacle, a burden upon believers.

Moreover, one cannot overlook the role of background music. You likely recognize the pattern: as the altar call commences, a musician—often a pianist—approaches the instrument and begins to play, ostensibly to evoke emotion while the preacher delivers his appeal. The effect borders on manipulation.

It is little wonder, then, that some appear to repent amid the swelling chords, only to revert to their former ways upon leaving the church, gradually drifting away or never returning. These are man-made traditions—foolish impediments and burdens of the modern church.

Prayer
Prayer represents a significant point of contention, as modern religious practices appear to distort God’s Word and His explicit instructions regarding this sacred act.
 
One particularly egregious habit of contemporary religion is the encouragement of the unrepentant to pray for others or their families—a practice that is unequivocally unbiblical. Scripture declares that the prayers of the unrepentant are an abomination to Yah, as is their worship. Yet, modern religious institutions frequently neglect to inform their congregants of this critical truth.
 
Yah’s ears are attuned to the prayers of the unrepentant only when they seek forgiveness for themselves with a genuine heart. It is solely upon receiving forgiveness and embarking on a path of holiness that they may rightfully intercede for others.
 
This pervasive lack of understanding, rooted in abundant ignorance, is largely attributable to the modern church. Consequently, one observes unrepentant individuals—those who reject repentance—joining hands in public spaces to pray for others, while spiritually stagnant churches applaud such displays. Rather than proclaiming the gospel, these institutions perpetuate their own traditions, guiding many toward a path of destruction.
 
A direct connection to Elohim is a privilege reserved for those who adhere to His commandments. The Torah does not sanction the wicked interceding on behalf of the wicked through prayer; such a notion lacks biblical foundation and constitutes an abomination.
Fainting Spells
Pastors and leadership
Speaking in tongues
Festivals
Dramas
Merchandise
Pulpits
Worship of angels
Ministries
Attendees
Worship
Pagan Customs

One of the most profound errors in modern Christianity lies in its disregard for Yah’s laws, particularly its rebellion against Yah’s Sabbath and its tacit allegiance to Catholicism—whether adherents acknowledge it or not. This includes denominations such as Pentecostals, Baptists, Presbyterians, Calvinists, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Mormons, and others, all of which trace their roots, directly or indirectly, to Catholicism. Many within these groups, if pressed for honesty, would concede this point. Consequently, we might describe these denominations as the daughters of Catholicism.

Why label them daughters of Catholicism?

The answer is clear: it was the Catholic Church that not only initiated the shift from the seventh-day Sabbath to Sunday worship but also enforced this change with authority. Early believers adhered faithfully to the biblical Sabbath until the Council of Laodicea (circa 363–364 AD) intervened. This council, among other actions, decreed that Christians should not “Judaize” by resting on the Sabbath, instead mandating work on that day and prioritizing the Lord’s Day—Sunday—as the day of honor. This marked a pivotal departure from the practices of the early Church, embedding a legacy that these daughter denominations have inherited and perpetuated.

Catholic Claims of Authority Over the Sabbath Change
The transition from Saturday Sabbath observance to Sunday worship occurred gradually in early Christianity, rooted in the resurrection of Yeshua (Jesus) (celebrated on Sunday) and early Christian practice (e.g., Acts 20:7).
 
However, the Catholic Church later formalized this shift and, in some writings, proudly claimed it as evidence of their authority to interpret and establish religious practice over strict biblical literalism. Here are the key sources where this shift emerges:
Council of Laodicea (circa 363–364 AD)
What It Says:

Canon 29 of this early Church council states: “Christians must not judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must work on that day, rather honoring the Lord’s Day; and, if they can, resting then as Christians. But if any shall be found to be judaizers, let them be anathema from Christ.”

Where to Find It:
Preserved in historical collections like The Seven Ecumenical Councils (translated by Henry Percival, 1900) or Charles Hefele’s A History of the Councils of the Church.
 
Consider this: the transformation originated from Catholicism, not from the scriptural texts. Yeshua came to guide the people back to His Father’s Torah, not to lead them astray from it. Consequently, due to this unholy shift, many are submitting themselves not to Yah, but to the Roman Catholic Church.
Do you understand now?

Thus, it becomes evident that the transition from the seventh-day Sabbath rest to Sunday rest was not ordained by Yeshua or Yah the Father, but rather instituted by fallible, religious corrupt men. These individuals presumed to take the Scriptures into their own hands, altering the sacred commandment to keep the Sabbath holy—a directive rooted in divine authority.

This departure from Yah’s law explains why these denominations fail to hear Yeshua’s audioble voice with clarity or truly know Him. Instead, they persist in disseminating falsehoods, leading both themselves and their followers astray. They overlook the profound promise of Yeshua, who declared in John 14:21, “Whoever has my commands and keeps them is the one who loves me. The one who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I too will love them and show myself to them.” This revelation, He prophesied, is reserved for those who faithfully obey His Father’s commandments, not to those who follow the errors of Roman Catholic Church.

Torah leaders and teacher always honor the seventh-day Sabbath which starts on Friday at sunset to Saturday at sunset, when it ends.

Want to know the consequences of this wicked shift?

Watch the video From Babylon To America below.

Are youth pastors biblical?

The answer is no. Youth pastors are not biblical; there is not a single mention of a “youth pastor” within the entirety of the 66 books of Scripture. This role is an invention of modern religious traditions, rooted in human folly rather than divine ordinance. Such practices have diluted the potency of Yah’s word and undermined the fulfillment of its promises wherever they are implemented. They burden new converts with unnecessary obstacles, robbing them of deeper spiritual understanding. This represents a misguided effort by confused, unenlightened, and unqualified leaders to refine a church order that Elohim has already perfected and which His Messiah has clearly taught.

Torah leaders and teachers do not engage in such folly. They faithfully adhere to the precise instructions set forth in the biblical text.

The modern-day church practices a strange tradition: locking doors when the word is read. Many, but not all, follow this human mandate. If His word provides understanding, faith, correction, and enlightenment, how is locking attendees out beneficial? This practice defies reason.

Some leaders claim it teaches punctuality, perhaps to embarrass latecomers. There are many issues with this flawed view. It’s ignorant and presumptuous to punish someone for tardiness without knowing legitimate reasons, like sickness, traffic, or picking someone up for service. It’s barbaric to impose such conditions.

Some leaders, unwilling to abandon this burdensome tradition, place TVs in hallways so latecomers can watch, or use speakers, while others do nothing. I’ve been in congregations that do such foolish things. People still open locked doors to use the bathroom, contradicting the restriction. This is not a temple of the Most High El; it’s a circus.

Unaware that, whether following the true Messiah or not, they accumulate sins by enforcing traditions, not Elohim’s laws. They pile up sins like unpaid bills. This foolishness defies reason.

Leave a Reply

Samuel Rodriguez 2024-2025 - PRIVACY POLICY AND TOS